Category: Michael D
Sermon Short
Every minister (pastor) has a process for creating the sermon. Mine includes study of the text through the help of biblical scholars, the context of the author’s experience, awareness of a 21st century context, silence, and holding the way Jesus of Nazareth made God knows as a compass for navigating interpretation. Then, I free write some paragraphs. Then, I come back to those paragraphs and start to sort and order into what becomes the finished text. Here are a few of the finished paragraphs that provides a sermon short.
The scripture text for the sermon is Matthew 23:1-12. Verse twelve drew my attention and was the focus of the sermon.
“All who exalt themselves will be humbled, and all who humble themselves will be exalted.”
This is Year A in the Lectionary which is a resource that, if followed, would help us read through most of the entire bible in three years. During Year A, we learn about the life and times of Jesus of Nazareth through the Gospel of Matthew’s experience. It is often a ’salty language’ good news. Salty language is often thought of as vulgar, but I don’t think that is what Jesus had in mind. When I think about it, given the state of our world and particularly our Nation, the good news of God that Jesus proclaimed might sound like salty language to those that profiter from partisan-ism, and from the working poor and middle class of all races and religions. Salty good news shines light in our lives and in the lives of leaders: religious and political. Salty good news is exactly what Jesus preached and sometimes he even used words.
So, it is not surprising that the biblical story afflicts the comfortable as well as comforts the afflicted.
The gospel writers often put difficult questions into the mouths of the Pharisees, scribes, and others, seeking to test or entrap Jesus in wrong answers. Last week it was a question about paying taxes to Caesar. The 23rd chapter of Matthew should come with this warning, “Rant alert.” Jesus has been questioned by Herodians, Sadducees, scribes, and Pharisees since he entered Jerusalem on parade day. Matthew uses these groups like character actors playing the antagonists role opposite Jesus who Christendom casts as the protagonist. But, I think a fair reading of all the gospels shows us that Jesus of Nazareth was the antagonists, in his context and often in our own.
Jesus questions the motives and character of his questioners; and by extension anyone that takes on leadership.
Those two English words, humble and exalted, are not a part of our daily vocabulary. We hear or use the words humility or praise which are adequate alternatives, but these do not give us the clue we need to our practice of faith today. I quick review at Dictionary.com gave me these definitions.
Humble: courteously respectful, not proud or arrogant; modest.
Humble: who do you see in your mind’s eye that fits that word?
Exalted: to praise, but it can also mean: to stimulate the imagination.
Exalted: We live in a hyper-stimulated culture. I indulge in it, benefit from it, and am limited by it. We all are. The always on internet, instant news and information from the far side of the world, energy drinks, very realistic video games that simulate everything, video on demand, blogging, Facebook, YouTube, texting and tweeting, hey Siri or hey Google. Our culture stunts a part of the imagination, but, not enough to wall off the human heart. This is why the imagination can be puzzled and inspired by words and images.
Words like, “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.” Images: strangers seeing neighbors when natural disasters and human made disasters happen.
The words and life of Jesus inspired Paul to have a moment of clarity and see in a mirror dimly, “Love is patient, kind, not envious or boastful, arrogant or rude. Love does not insist on its own way; it is not irritable, resentful; it does not rejoice in wrongdoing, but rejoices in truth. Love bears all things, believes all things, hopes all things, and endures all things.”
Maybe that’s the best we can do: actions based in moments of clarity.
Jesus asks if we understand humility in our own time: the difference between living an open invitation and rounding up the perceived ‘D’ list folks for a party. The difference between Christianity’s “believe and be saved” invitation, rather than practice the ways Jesus made God known in the world.
Momentary clarity. I’m not completely sure, but I think this is how we experience exalted humbleness and maybe put it into practice.
Money & Racism on a Friday Morning
When I travel for retreats to be with friends, peers, and colleagues I often alter my morning routine. Sleep is needed after late nights discussing the issues of the day, and at this retreat, ideas about outdoor ministry and my denomination, the Christian Church (Disciples of Christ). Luckily, my routine doesn’t include exercise right now, but it does include reading of news and information. I found these three compelling this morning.
From Axios, reporting on some words from the Commander of the Air Force Academy that were first reported by the Colorado Springs Gazette.
“Lt. Gen. Jay Silveria, superintendent of the Air Force Academy, yesterday “stood all of his 4,000 cadets at attention … [c]hins in and chests out … to deliver a message on racial slurs found written on message boards at the academy’s preparatory school,” The (Colorado Springs) Gazette reports.”
Click here to read more.
“Mark Felt,” the Movie, and Donald Trump, the President
Jeffrey Toobin, The NewYorker
“Follow the money.” These are the words most closely associated with Deep Throat, Bob Woodward’s famous Watergate source, as memorably portrayed by Hal Holbrook in the movie version of “All the President’s Men.”
What the Rich Won’t Tell You
Rachel Shermon, Sunday Review, The New York Times
“Is the society we want one in which it is acceptable for some people to have tens of millions or billions of dollars as long as they are hardworking, generous, not materialistic and down to earth? Or should there be some other moral rubric, that would strive for a society in which such high levels of inequality were morally unacceptable, regardless of how nice or moderate its beneficiaries are?”