Category: Culture
Social Justice
I’ve been thinking about Glenn Beck’s remarks about social justice and Churches that preach or practice a “social justice” theology. I participated in the Sojourner’s email blitz on Beck and Fox News (can it still be called news)? That was not satisfying. Why? Because it seems to energize Fox, Beck, and the Tea Party crowd. In the end they are selling the newest snake oil packaged as patriotism and proudly anti-intellectual. They are interested in making another holy dollar. What would be satisfying? For serious Republicans and Democrats (the adults among them) who are interested in working for the common good of all Americans to stop appearing on Fox, writing for any Fox owned print or web publications. What would be satisfying? For the serious conservatives among us, whatever that means, to stop appearing on Beck’s show, any Fox programming, or writing for their print or web publications. That would be satisfying. Like so much in our culture, the Fox corporation entertains, tears down, creates only anxiety, and promotes emotional voyeurism to sell its product. What is its product? Some would argue the other side of the story? It appears to be dissention.
Back in the fall I was waiting for a car to be serviced at a car dealership. They, of course, had Fox on the TV in the waiting area. Beck was going on and on about something. Two guys, two sales team members, came out of their offices and took up positions watching Beck. They noticed me and asked what I thought. I wanted to just check email. They commented on the brilliance of Beck and how down to earth he is. I thought they must be joking, but customers came in and were ignored while these two 35 to 50 year old, white men, were glued to Beck’s words. I wanted to be connected and dialogue, but they saw no dialogue needed. Beck good. Obama bad. Republican good. Anyone believing or practicing anything else, the problem and ignored. I wanted to be pastoral and curious, but could not muster it. I’ve never been back to that dealership.
The best response to Beck I have read so far is from Martin Marty. This week’s Sightings elegantly questions Beck and those that follow.
Social Justice
by Martin Marty | Sighting’s | March 15, 2010
Are 68.1 million Americans connected with a Communist front movement? Yes, if they are Roman Catholic. Are another 20 million citizens listening to “coded” Nazi messages? Yes, if they are mainline Protestant. Are tens of millions more in danger of being part of a similarly coded Fascist front? Yes, if they are in a growing wing of Evangelicalism; and yes, if they keep hearing social justice messages in thousands of African-American congregations. Those four “yeses” pick up on oft-repeated accusations by Fox News host Glenn Beck. They provoked the least underreported public religion news of the week, which appeared in the March 12th New York Times as well as “all over the internet.”
The fact that Mr. Beck charms millions of devotees tells more about the sad state of truth-telling and the high state of lie-receiving than civil citizens should want to hear. The broadcaster has picked up an ally in folk like Jerry Falwell, Jr. and a few other fundamentalists on the right who have been at least as condemnatory as he. Their most cited biblical passage is from the gospels, where Jesus announces that his kingdom is not of his world; therefore they conclude that Christians should avoid political life. A test of ironies: Quick, now, can you think of any element in American religion which has been more publicly engaged in recent politicking than these “not-of-this-world” dwellers in glass houses?
Where should they direct the stones they must throw? And how should they follow through? Mr. Beck knows: Leave any church which talks about, supports, or “does” works of justice beyond what an individual or a church charity can do. “Leave!” “Run!” Do it fast, he says, because of the way things are going. He might as well be wearing a beard, a robe, and a sign: “THE END IS NEAR.” Before that end, these “social justice” churches might at least fling some pebbles back while they seek consistency. Ask: Would all the Christians and the churches which accept any benefits of Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, tax exemption and other such programs cut them off tomorrow? They all involve the government and all were backed by “social and economics minded” leaders and followers in churches, often against the odds raised and symbolized by the Glenn Becks of their past.
Sightings likes to be fair and to see more than one side of things as it does its observing and commenting. So let it be noted that some sane and serious Christians also think that believers should pay no attention to public order, structures, circumstances, and possibilities. “Don’t talk justice! Just be just!” “Don’t support programs which support widows and orphans, just share your bread and coat and cold water with your innocently needy neighbor.” Thereafter do the math: It will become obvious that the limits on the individual responses to need at their highest won’t meet needs if reckoned at their lowest.
Biblical verses wisely do remind readers, “Put not your trust in princes.” That usually means governments; “princes” in the media, banking, punditry, universities, and, yes, churches demand scrutiny, and their programs deserve careful evaluation, as well. But those who say that you have taken care of biblical injunctions if you simply keep government out of everything face biblical reminders with which they have to contend: The Hebrew prophets all dealt with “nations,” and the apostle Paul, writing to people suffering under Nero, also said that civil “authority…is God’s servant for your good (Romans 13:4). Paul even goes so far in 13:6 to urge believers to “pay taxes, for the authorities are God’s servants.” Come on, Paul, don’t press your luck in Beck’s world!
God versus God
Sightings
by Martin Marty | March 8, 2010
We are in for another intense round of “God vs. God,” “Our God vs. Their God,” “Good God vs. Bad God=Devil.” The current round comes from many readers of Mosab Hassan Yousef’s new Son of Hamas, which reads like a spy novel and whose “gripping” plot needs no publicity from me. Yousef is becoming almost unavoidable in and on the media. The work of a son of a founder of Hamas and a top spy for Israel’s Shin Bet, whose espionage efforts and about-faces others can appraise, is interesting to Sightings for its content on a particular subject, the author’s preached view of “The Islamic God.”
Sean Hannity, who may not often be cited here as a mild one, was chastised by bloggers for being unaroused by Yousef’s theology. The Fox TV host was even criticized by many for being “PC,” too politically correct to join in the attack on Allah when he interviewed Yousef on March 4th. And attack there certainly was. Yousef: “There are no moderate Muslims.” “All Muslims are the same,” namely fanatics. “They believe in a god of the Koran and they believe that this Koran is from that god.” More: “The most criminal terrorist Muslim has more morality than their God,” contended Yousef; “Their god is a terrorist and ignorant.”
The March 5th Wall Street Journal featured a page-wide bold-print headline above its interview of Yousef by Matthew Kaminski: “THEY NEED TO BE LIBERATED FROM THEIR GOD.” Killing can play its part, but, you guessed it, Yousef also relies on spiritual demolition for such liberation. Yousef says his father is not a fanatic, but “he’s doing the will of a fanatic God…a fanatic, fundamentalist, terrorist God.” Governments “don’t want to admit this is an ideological war…The problem is not Muslims. The problem is their God. He is their biggest enemy.”
Yousef – again, you guessed it – is living in the U.S. as a convert to Christianity. In his book and in interviews he says nice things about “the grace, love and humility that Jesus talked about.” It did take courage for Yousef to become an apostate and break with Islam, his family, and the spy-world he served. Henceforth? Max Scheler wrote that an apostate “is engaged in a continuous chain of acts of revenge against his own spiritual past.” There may be plenty against which to react, but one has to ask what good his demonizing of his neighbor’s God will do in the already mutually demonizing conflicts of our day. What René Girard calls “the mimetic principle” is in action here and these days: You say something about our God and they say something worse about ours, so we say something “worser” yet about theirs, in a constant escalation which can lead to neither security for us or a better (in our eyes) alternative for them.
“Them” Muslims find texts from a book that serves “us” as the Koran serves “them:” namely, the Bible. Several titles on my shelf signal the riches available (see below). The warrior God was cited on all sides in World War I, for example, where Christian clergy and laity alike invoked this God on the side of Germany versus this God on the side of France and, with denominational variants, of England and the United States. World War I is not the last time “we” read a scripture in which “our God” inspired us to do the worst. Most citizens and soldiers may not have licensed atrocity and indiscriminate mass killing, but “our God” did not help the merciful show grace, love and humility,” and made post-war peacemaking more difficult.
—————–
References:
Sample titles about the warrior God in the Bible include Yahweh is a Warrior, by Millard C. Lind; The Problem of War in the Old Testament by Peter C. Craigie; Holy War in Ancient Israel, by Gerhard von Rad; the Hebrew Bible and the New Testament, by various authors.
Read the Wall Street Journal interview with Yousef: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703915204575103481069258868.html?KEYWORDS=yousef
Watch the Hannity interview at http://www.jihadwatch.org/2010/03/son-of-hamas-top-dog-moderate-islam-does-not-exist.html
Martin E. Marty’s biography, current projects, publications, and contact information can be found at www.illuminos.com.