Category: Theological Rant
the Latest Sightings . . .
The Kingdom of Heaven and the IRS
— Martin E. Marty
3/25/12A Gentile (as in Russell P. Gentile) is the most recent, perhaps most earnest, certainly the boldest claimant, on the government and religion news front in the winter just past. While others have protested along the line of “separation of church and state” when government is interpreted as having crossed that line, Gentile goes further. The Florida businessman pleaded that he should not be punished (as he will be punished) for not having paid owed taxes which he argues that he does not owe. While the public is familiar with Catholic bishops being critical on the issue of having to pay taxes, even indirectly, or even “indirectly indirectly” when a government policy apparently conflicts with conscientious and doctrinal issues, Gentile will not pay taxes for anything. We are familiar with Baptists and others who hold the line on “separation,” Gentile poses a transcendent issue.
In short, he says he is not subject to human laws but is an American national who “resided in the Kingdom of Heaven.” He has been “as polite and patient” as he could be, but threatens to sue if the Feds come after him. (Thy have come.) He would not report his income, and faces substantial federal prison time and fines. He broke numbers of laws and set out to obstruct justice. The legal cases continue, and outcomes are uncertain as we write. Why waste readers’ time on a case that can be described as comical and trivial?
The problem is that the Kingdom of Heaven is invoked in other cases as well. James Madison’s words argue “that it may not be easy, in every possible case, to trace the line of separation between the rights of religion and the civil authority with such distinctness as to avoid collisions and doubt on unessential points.” And most colliders say that they deal with essential points. These days we are told that Catholic and Evangelical authorities are the chief critics of the civil authority. Does Mr. Gentile’s apparently bizarre claim cast light on the others? We have to prove he is conscientious and sincere, though he is a bad calculator if he thinks that he can hold on to all his money as a member in the Kingdom of God. The last we heard from a relevant source, the New Testament, it claims all that one has and is.
Back to reality: we are in tangles over what is “essential,” what is “authority,” and who has the power to tie up government, gain media time, and affect policy. Are Catholic and Evangelical leaders the only ones who have a moral right to raise these issues? Do they succeed because they have the money, the power, and the clout to advance their claims? Every year, every day, thousands of Americans, equally conscientious as they are, do not get their way when government policies conflict with their consciences. Jehovah’s Witnesses go to jail and other “sects” make legal cases and irritate the courts as they refuse to follow mandates to have their children vaccinated, etc. Those who oppose fluoridation of water are inconvenienced. Pacifists know that we know that they suffer for conscience’s sake whenever they pay federal taxes, and will get no more than sympathy from those of us who share their conviction but do not probe to its depths. Or who do not make a legal case of being members of the Kingdom of Heaven.
Conclusion: we citizens need patience, dialogue, study, and argument of more reasoned, thoughtful, and sympathetic character than we often see and hear and show. Otherwise Mr. Gentile and his kind will be the ones who make the best case.
References
J. D. Gallop, “Melbourne Man Faces Prison after Making Deal with IRS,” Florida Today, March 20, 2012.
—. “IRS Intervention Not Divine for Melbourne Man,” Florida Today, March 21, 2012.
James Madison is quoted from a letter to the Rev. Jasper Adams, in John F. Wilson (ed.), Church and State in American History (Boston D C Heath, 1965), pp. 77-78.
Remembering . . .
I read lots of newspapers online. One of them is the LA Times. The OP-ED for today, March 25, touches on some themes that were once strengths of my denomination, the Christian Church (Disciples of Christ). We welcomed questions, doubters, unchurched, de-churched and refugees from other mainline, evangelical, and Catholic expressions of faith all the while working for the common good of local and global communities by being a voice of gospel. These were once a part of our DNA, our ethos, that distinguished our brand of Christian witness from the various versions of Baptists, non-denominational, and Church of Christ. That was then. In some Disciples congregations you will still find and experience this kind of DNA and ethos. If emergent were a word back in the time of Stone and Campbell it would have been hung on them, maybe.
I’ve returned from an eight day trip with high school youth, grades 10-12, to Washington D.C. and New York City. Our denomination calls this International Affairs Seminar. We choose a study topic for the trip and make sure youth have an opportunity to see monuments, meet with Congressional Reps, and have the opportunity to expand their world view as well as explore their own beliefs. The trip encourages doubt, questions, dialogue and conversation with persons as well as with oneself. Last year the Oklahoma trip focuses on Faith and Economics. This year it focused on Immigration. It could be called “emergent” in today’s religious expression. If we Disciples are going to find our way and claim a brand identity that is different than the Christianity being packaged for public and political consumption it will require a complete remodel of our corporate structure and investment, dollars and time, in the church we want to be in a decade.
Letting the Doubters in the Door
by Phillip Clayton | LA Time OP-ED | March 25, 2012“The Rise of the Nones” is one of 10 trends changing American life, according to Time magazine’s March 12 cover story. That’s because the “nones” — those who mark “none” on surveys that ask them to identify their religious affiliation — are the fastest-growing religious group in the United States.
Not surprisingly, the increase in the unaffiliated comes at the expense of America’s mainstream religions, which means that Christianity is taking the biggest hit. Mainstream Protestant churches have lost more than a third of their members since 1960. Evangelical churches are also feeling the pinch; Southern Baptists are hurting. Various surveys illuminate this trend: About 75% of Americans between the ages of 18 and 29 now consider themselves “spiritual but not religious.” Furthermore, all traditional forms of Christian practice have sharply declined from previous decades (including church attendance, Bible study and prayer), and doubts are much sharper regarding traditional Christian beliefs.