The Latest “Sightings”

American Idolatry: The King James Version
— M. Cooper Harriss | July 15, 2010

Americans have “a thing” for the Decalogue, displaying it publicly – wherever a court injunction for its removal might be evaded – alongside American flags and presidential portraits.  Early in these ten commandments, we learn that YHWH forbids idolatry: “Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth: thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them” (Exodus 20:4-5).  The foregoing translation comes from the “Authorized” or “King James” version of the Bible.  This week another “King James” looms large: LeBron James, the American basketball player who last week announced his intentions to leave his “hometown” Cleveland Cavaliers (James is an Akron, Ohio native) to sign with the Miami Heat in the most scrutinized and hyperbolized free agent signing in American sporting history.

The ordeal that came to be known as “LeBronikah” serves as a broad critical accounting of our days and our distractions, and simultaneously offers an intriguing opportunity for exploring the religious valences of this profane festival of highlights.  James’s nicknames – the biblically evocative “King James” and the Messianic “Chosen One” – carry heavy religious inflections.  Nike, who pays James more than he’ll ever make playing basketball to wear and hawk its paraphernalia, advertises that “We are all witnesses” to James’s miracles, though they fall short of encouraging us to tell no one of what we have seen.

More fascinating is the willingness of other actors to play along.  Shortly after the announcement, Dan Gilbert, majority owner of the Cleveland Cavaliers, posted an incensed open letter on the team’s website, mocking James’s authenticity to the point of demythologization (he places “King,” “witnessed,” and other adulatory language in scare quotes) and offering a soteriological critique of his former employee (“Some people think they should go to heaven but NOT have to die to get there”) before weighing in on the blessing and the curse of the entire situation:

But the good news is that this heartless and callous action can only serve as the antidote to the so-called “curse” on Cleveland, Ohio.

The self-declared former “King” will be taking the “curse” with him down south. And until he does “right” by Cleveland and Ohio, James (and the town where he plays) will unfortunately own this dreaded spell and bad karma.

Curses, atonement, scapegoating, and even karma appear in the theological buckshot of Gilbert’s remarks.  Such harsh words might prove gratifying were they not also the calculated attempt of a man who has profited immeasurably from James’s popularity and success over the past seven years to capitalize upon public outrage in his team’s favor.  His demythologization, arriving in the wake of a free agent’s freely-made decision to depart, not only rings hollow but becomes doubly problematic when one considers that he, James’s “owner” in a system frequently compared to antebellum plantations, was more than willing to reap riches from his metaphysical “baller” for the better part of a decade, and hoped to continue doing so for the foreseeable future.

James became the new scapegoat for Cleveland and Ohio, a suffering region that, the pundits say, has seen better days and sorely needs the hope that James represented.  Appropriately, the decision initiated rites of sacrifice as fans burned number 23 James jerseys to purify themselves of the betrayal.  The Internet plays an interesting role in this ritualization of grief.   The sports website Deadspin compiled more than a dozen videos from YouTube of fans burning James’s jersey.  Gawker, Deadspin’s sister site, noted a growing trend of homemade videos in which fans filmed their (distraught) reactions to James’s decision as the announcement happened, bringing the proverbial sackcloth and ashes to YouTube’s mandate to “broadcast yourself” in almost real time – an interesting twenty-first century revision of traditionally conceived modes of public outcry and communal mourning.

What, finally, does the LeBron James decision say about our present cultural occasion?  It reveals idolatry, to be sure, in how we find distraction in less-than-ultimate concerns and delude ourselves into believing that the idol is without fracture; that money, agility, and fame matter more in the grander scheme of justice than compassion, humanity, and love.  But, while true, such diagnoses avoid the more trenchant valences of this occasion. Sightings periodically turns to sporting events because they reflect something profound about peoples’ cultural imaginations.  Christian Sheppard’s observations about baseball and American football, and Joseph Price’s reflections upon the Super Bowl, for instance, suggest that the highest levels of athletic competition reveal something transcendent in human striving – virtue, courage, the sanctification of national identity.  Following their examples, then, we are left to measure what this all means: the manufactured outrage over disloyalty, our marketplace of allegiances as fans, idols, and saviors.  What do such properties convey about the social order we inhabit, which we reflect in the myths we create, and destroy, together?  Nike has this much right:  We are all witnesses.  Accordingly, may we neither bear such witness falsely nor overlook the insights that these myths reveal.

References:

Dan Gilbert’s open letter may be found here: http://www.nba.com/cavaliers/news/gilbert_letter_100708.html

For more on comparisons of the NBA’s division of labor to American slavery, please see Mark Anthony Neal’s Soul Babies: Black Popular Culture and the Post-Soul Aesthetic (London and New York: Routledge, 2002).

http://deadspin.com/5583347/a-lebron+jersey+burning+video-roundup  (Please note: Deadspin features satire that some readers may find crass or vulgar.)

http://gawker.com/5582924/here-are-people-overreacting-to-lebron-james-decision-to-join-the-miami-heat/gallery/

Read Christian Sheppard here:  http://divinity.uchicago.edu/martycenter/publications/sightings/archive_2005/0811.shtml
http://divinity.uchicago.edu/martycenter/publications/sightings/archive_2006/0202.shtml

Read Joseph Price here: http://divinity.uchicago.edu/martycenter/publications/sightings/archive_2005/0210.shtml

Really? Crime Against Faith. Really?

When I saw this, “Vatican Says Women Priests a ‘Crime Against Faith,'” I thought I was reading a headline from The Onion, but after further review this is an actual news story posted on the Telegraph.co.uk — then I kept reading.  Headlines like this are why our “liberal” denomination’s practice of Christian faith is important.  We are an oasis for those that discover that they can no longer journey in faith in their current denominational expression of Christian faith.  There will be many in Catholicism that will applaud this move as a necessary protection of orthodox faith and the many are will be primarily in developing countries or are in post-industrial countries so invested in the institutional Catholic church that their very identity as well as their world view is challenged by the idea of women priests.  The people in the pews that practice orthodox Catholic catechism are good people, but Pope Benedict XVI and the men that protect him, and orthodox Catholic faith, are segregating themselves from the rest of practicing Christianity.  Not to mention that the Pope, as the Vicar of Christ, by extension just claimed that women ordained into Christian faith and those that recognize their ordinations are Christian criminals.  Has he read the New Testament?  Mary Magdalene went and told the men, who were hiding, that she has seen the risen Christ?  Really?

Vatican Says Women Priests a ‘Crime Against Faith
by Fiona Govan | Telegraph | 15 July 2010

The new rules issued by the Vatican puts attempts at ordaining women among the “most serious crimes” alongside paedophilia and will be handled by investigators from the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF), considered the successor to the Inquistion.

Women attempting to be priests, and those who try to ordain them, already faced automatic excommunication but the new decree goes further and enshrines the action as “a crime against sacraments”.

Read the New York Times reporting:

Vatican Rulse Equate Pedophilia and Ordaining Women
by Rachel Donadio | The New York Times | July 15, 2010

VATICAN CITY — The Vatican issued revisions to its internal laws on Thursday making it easier to discipline sex-abuser priests, but caused confusion by also stating that ordaining women as priests was as grave an offense as pedophilia.

he decision to link the issues appears to reflect the determination of embattled Vatican leaders to resist any suggestion that pedophilia within the priesthood can be addressed by ending the celibacy requirement or by allowing women to become priests.